Dear John,
> Marcus, I do not think what your trying to do is going to work. Why?
> "failover peer "intra-net"" . You will need a dhcp.master configuration file
> on both servers. You running two dhcp servers? Debug with only one server.
Of course, the failover is set up and working correctly. Please note
that I am not new to dhcpd3 configuration.
> Her's my opinion. You need to just start out with a simple dhcp.conf,
I have already disabled failover configuration during debug state.
> single server and let that be it. On every change you make back it up before
> a change to it. Get one laptop and don't use any WiFi Security on itand take
> out the keys defined for it in in the dhcp file. You should not need a host
> declaration for the laptop if your wantting to get an assigned addy from the
> 10.2.0.0 range
That's what I thought, too. But it does not work if there is a host
declaration for that MAC in another subnet. Maybe it's just a silly
bug.
> OK, now while on the laptop topic theres a special decleration you can
> provide for an option "option dhcp-server-identifier x.x.x.x;" What this
> will accomplish is maybe letting your laptops obtain and address. Certain
> Operatting systems can not distinguish between the "SYN" and "ACK" proccess
> of a Unix style ddns. Linux/Unix usualy have no problems with it. This can
> be seen with something like WireShark or tcp-dump on the network. Using
> those two would greatly help solve your problem also. Another note your
> failover dhcp server needs to be the same version as the main one
It is.
> One final note your laptop can be obtaining an address then dropping it
> because of RF conectivity issues.
This behavior occurs on all clients, so I don't think so.
Best Regards
Marcus
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
