Re: new list proposal - meaningless

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Spike Turner wrote:
perhaps that is why "core" issues in CentOS like the kernel and samba are ignored by the developers? Examples :-

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066143.html

Thats a bit of a dribveby waste of space post that does not really merit a reply from anyone. Also if that was something that concerns you so much, what have you done about it ?

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066154.html

Johnny has been working on those.

If the CentOS devs don't have time to answer key questions such as
on the kernel but have time to consider fragmenting the mailing list
who wins/loses?

What barriers did you run into when you tried to help with the situation and try to be a better member of the community ?

- KB
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux