Kai Schaetzl a écrit : > Ralph Angenendt wrote on Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:24:08 +0200: > >> If you don't know the smallest MTU on the path to the mail server, you >> might not be able to send packets over that path, especially if DF is >> set. > > But if it's not set? Shouldn't most devices have it not set? > It's not per device. It's a method to improve performances. http://www.znep.com/~marcs/mtu/ _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery
- From: mouss <mouss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 23:32:21 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <VA.00003432.1996fc4e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <277020fc0810140613m57e4e941gbdcb30008ec76104@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <VA.00003430.18f1a6de@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081014152408.GW13066@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <VA.00003432.1996fc4e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080925)
- References:
- Sendmail and pmtu discovery
- From: Sean Carolan
- Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Sendmail and pmtu discovery
- Prev by Date: Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery
- Next by Date: OT: is parted reliable?
- Previous by thread: Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery
- Next by thread: Re: Sendmail and pmtu discovery
- Index(es):
 |