Re: Firefox3 for CentOS4 -- dependency on evolution28 packages?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Bart Schaefer
<barton.schaefer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd been putting off installing the FX3 packages because of some
> extensions I use that don't have upgrades. [*]  However, when FX1.5
> crashed on me today I decided to finally go ahead.  Fired up yum and
> I'm told I have to install a slew of evolution28 library packages in
> order to install the firefox package.  Why?  I removed evolution from
> my system for a reason, and I'd just as soon it stays gone.
>
> [*] Additional off-topic rant:  Why was the API access to form history
> removed from Firefox?  Why must I throw away my entire history to get
> rid of a few typographical errors to reduce the number of bogus field
> completion choices I'm offered?

You probably ought to ask these questions on a Mozilla discussion list
or report it as a bug to bugzilla.mozilla.org.

mhr
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux