Spike Turner wrote on Wed, 8 Oct 2008 23:00:54 -0700 (PDT): > The apache docs state that it does no harm well, that's wrong. Change alle your pages to be UTF-8 or remove it. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:31:21 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <399739.48698.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <399739.48698.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- From: Ralph Angenendt
- Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- References:
- Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- From: Spike Turner
- Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Prev by Date: Re: Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32
- Next by Date: Thunderbird does not follow url links in Firefox
- Previous by thread: Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Next by thread: Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Index(es):
 |