Spike Turner wrote on Wed, 8 Oct 2008 14:06:37 -0700 (PDT): > Given that apache has the default charset shouldn't it honor it? Because that page is served with UTF-8 by Apache. What you want to do is comment that line in the Apache config out. It's a really stupid setting, not really understandable why they put it in the default config. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 01:31:18 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <100213.19298.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <100213.19298.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- From: Spike Turner
- Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- References:
- Apache Charset vs html file charset
- From: Spike Turner
- Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Prev by Date: Samba 3.0.28/3.0.32
- Next by Date: Re: rpmforge, perl-dbd-mysql, yum, priorities, centos, and you
- Previous by thread: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Next by thread: Re: Apache Charset vs html file charset
- Index(es):
 |