Re: ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Damian S wrote:
Just one final thing (hope it helps someone in future), according to Dan
Walsh, much better (more fine-grained) than setting the allow_execmem
boolean is to do this:
chcon -t unconfined_execmem_exec_t /opt/ejabberd-2.0.2_2/bin/beam.smp

And file this as something the rpm packager needs to look at for ejabberd, its not a bug in CentOS.


--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522219@icq
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux