Re: ejabberd 2.0.2 vs SELinux vs CentOS 5

["nate" <centos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Damian S wrote:
> To answer my question, I have found the allow_execmem boolean, and set
> it.
>
> So, should I file a bug with someone?
>
> Also, I'm thinking I might run into more problems with SELinux silently
> interfering with ejabberd later on, so maybe I should disable SELinux
> and be done with it.

That's what I'd suggest too. SELinux isn't even installed on any
of the systems I manage(roughly 350). Not worth the trouble.

nate


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos