Karanbir Singh wrote:
> ok, so you chased down Lutz's machine, broke into it
> and were able to
> verify his yum configs are changed or did you pull that one
> out of thin
> air.
> I do suspect something is not right, since the 4.7 updates
> took as long
> as they did to get to his machine. They have been 'out
> there' for a fair
> few weeks now. And the concern that live updates within the
> distro broke
> a production machine is very much there.
>
>From the notes on the "bug" you would have to have 4.5/os/$basearch/
instead of $releasever/os/$basearch/ to get the "bug". Also yum update
or upgrade should not break anything unless you have packages from
elsewhere and murked about with the configs. I have looked on the
last month's list and not seen :-
- people whose machines took weeks to autoupdate.
- people whose production machines were broken by 4.6 to 4.7
Clearly Lutz's situation is unique and he has not told us the whole story.
Regards,
Vandaman.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
