On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 01:54:32PM +0200, Griesbach, Lutz wrote: Please wrap your lines at a reasonable length; 72 to 76 characters is good, thanks! > Also I didn't now, that nightly updates include upgrades and this > doesn't makes sense to me either. Who wants to get 193 packages including What do you think the difference is between "update" and "upgrade" ? A minor release (eg going from 4.6 to 4.7) is _merely_ a stick in the sand. Kernel updates happen frequently even within a minor release number. >From the OS perspective there's no difference. -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Nightly yum update did an "upgrade"
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Nightly yum update did an "upgrade"
- From: Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 08:59:32 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <A41D4C603FAB75439354F0E48234284B0449416A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <A41D4C603FAB75439354F0E48234284B0449413A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <914725.91704.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <A41D4C603FAB75439354F0E48234284B0449416A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
- References:
- Nightly yum update did an "upgrade"
- From: Griesbach, Lutz
- Re: Nightly yum update did an "upgrade"
- From: vandaman2002-rt
- AW: Nightly yum update did an "upgrade"
- From: Griesbach, Lutz
- Nightly yum update did an "upgrade"
- Prev by Date: AW: Nightly yum update did an "upgrade"
- Next by Date: Re: XDMCP - no GDM login, only gray screen with X
- Previous by thread: Re: Nightly yum update did an "upgrade"
- Next by thread: Re: Nightly yum update did an "upgrade"
- Index(es):
 |