> nate wrote:
Try calling the cgi directly like my example instead of executing perl in a shell.
Will do. Mel _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: tech <tech@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:46:24 +0800
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <2975.65.102.144.193.1222706372.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <gbpnfd$fhf$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <VA.000033bd.0dde2c4c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gbqnmn$he0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <A4121CBC-AF96-4280-AFD8-EFCAA126CA86@xxxxxxxxx> <gbqsen$34t$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2782.65.102.144.193.1222704482.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gbqva1$dp3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2898.65.102.144.193.1222705548.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gbr034$ggu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2975.65.102.144.193.1222706372.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
- References:
- Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: tech
- Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: tech
- Re: Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: Steve Huff
- Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: tech
- Re: Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: nate
- Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: tech
- Re: Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: nate
- Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: tech
- Re: Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- From: nate
- Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- Prev by Date: Re: Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- Next by Date: Re: GUI FTP
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- Next by thread: Re: Re: Probably a bad set-up but which one?
- Index(es):
 |