RE: Re: DKIM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



 

> 
> Karanbir post was brief and to the point. yours is a personal attack. 
> Even if Bob missed your excellent recommendation, there is no 
> reason to get mad.
> _______________________________________________


I gotta agree that we need to close this thread. It seems whether a mailing
list or a forum thread that lasts too long starts going off topic and gets
personal.

It is very easy to misinterpret what someone meant to say, either in jest or
authority.

And as it grows, the original need is lost. The originail need was 
Do you use dkim and how did you implement it?

I think we found that DKIM is optional and not a realy need.
On top of it we found, with argument, that spf is needed, but can cause mail
problems.

Lets just end it. I think a lot of good information came out of it and a lot
of people with different knowledge areas all inputted.

Karanbir said lets drop it, so lets drop it.
No one meant to offend anyone, but it is not helping anymore.

I will check out spf in full, and not use dkim.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux