On Aug 31, 2008, at 11:17 PM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote:
also NOT top posting? - Wht do u mean by this I don't get u.
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:54 AM, MHR <mhullrich@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:58 AM, Sadaruwan Samaraweera
<slinuxworld@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
> thx every much trying to get me on to the right track and I
apologize for
> being such an ass. Sorry again yes I made a big mistake. I was
under lot of
> pressure in my private life so I think that might have come over me.
Well, now that the pressure's off, or lightened, how about editing
your posts, and also NOT top posting?
he means what you did just here, and in your other posts. :) you put
your response above the quoted message you were replying to, rather
than below it. please don't do this; it makes it difficult to follow
the conversation, and thus it decreases the likelihood that you will
get the responses you want.
also, when i just now did a google search for "top posting", the
entire first page of hits were all links that explained what he was
talking about.
-steve
---
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
