On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i would look into the HIP stuff. But also look at the Hamachi like solutions such as EOIP - Ethernet Over IP (built into dd-wrt) and tinc-vpn.
Jeff Kinz wrote:Actually 'we' (crypto community) talk about crypto-suites, as you have to look at all the pieces involved. If everything is not disclosed (like with Skype), then you just don't know where the weakness may be.
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:04:21PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
Is there an easy way or anyway to establish a 128 bit encrypted tunnel between a handful of centos 5.2 boxes?
In addition the rest of the good info others already posted for you,
please remember that "128 bit encryption" doesn't mean anything unless you also specify the encryption scheme being used.
A 128 bit encryption scheme may or may not be easily broken depending on
which one it is. (Pick a good!)
SSH, IPsec (watch out for the 'Null' cipher :) ), TLS (some of the suites are too weak to talk about), and HIP are all well-rounded security protocols. I have worked on all of them.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
i would look into the HIP stuff. But also look at the Hamachi like solutions such as EOIP - Ethernet Over IP (built into dd-wrt) and tinc-vpn.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
