On Saturday 23 August 2008 07:53:08 Ric Moore wrote: > On Sat, 2008-08-23 at 07:45 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Saturday 23 August 2008 07:28:22 Mark Hull-Richter wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 10:46 -0700, nate wrote: > > > > MHR wrote: > > > > > So, is this a bug in the automounter? Is there a reason why a > > > > > removable (flash) drive MUST have a label for the automounter to > > > > > see it? This doesn't happen with flash memory cards (compact > > > > > flash, SD), just USB flash (disk) drives. Seems funky.... > > > > > > > > Anything in the logs? > > > > > > > > nate > > > > > > I didn't think to look then, and I can't find anything there now. > > > > > > Interesting side note: I have another drive that (still) has no label, > > > amd CentOS mounts that one as /media/disk every time. Go figure. > > > > Maybe the drive that doesn't mount doesn't announce itself correctly? > > Rather like the problem with some monitors. I believe I have read of > > such problems, but can't remember where. For automounting to work some > > info has to be read from the drive, I believe, so this does seem a > > possibility. > > Would you believe that I got that Xvfb issue resolved by installing > CentOS?? <grins> Ric > OTOH I got a new ViewSonic monitor, treating myself to one with a DV output. CentOS couldn't handle it and I had to got back to analogue :-( Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
