google said that is a bug of kernel in network driver.
And, someone seems to present a patch to fix the bug, however
I would like to know whether it can work from others' works becuause
reinstalling a new kernel may let us cost a lot.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ian jonhson wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I selected CentOS5 in my works and installed them in two DELL
>> PowerEdge1950.
>> However, a trouble blocked me during the machines run after two days.
>> The machines
>> crashed and the syslog said it got the following messages:
>>
>> ------------------ part dump of /var/log/messages ----------------------
>>
>> .....
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c045bc58>] ? exit_mmap+0x93/0xc9
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04214c2>] ? mmput+0x25/0x68
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046e9c9>] ?
>> flush_old_exec+0x4f8/0x777
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046dfcf>] ? kernel_read+0x32/0x43
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c0490e60>] ?
>> load_elf_binary+0x359/0x1152
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c045a6ee>] ?
>> get_user_pages+0x2d5/0x35c
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04570d2>] ? page_address+0x78/0x98
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c045735a>] ? kmap_high+0x19/0x16b
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04570d2>] ? page_address+0x78/0x98
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046dced>] ? copy_strings+0x169/0x173
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046ddad>] ?
>> search_binary_handler+0x8f/0x1af
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046efe7>] ? do_execve+0x133/0x194
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04030d7>] ? sys_execve+0x2a/0x4a
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04047aa>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c0610000>] ? early_init_intel+0x0/0x3c
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: =======================
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for
>> 61s! [sshd:24188]
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel:
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: Pid: 24188, comm: sshd Not tainted
>> (2.6.25.3 #3)
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP: 0060:[<c06154f0>] EFLAGS: 00200293
>> CPU: 7
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EIP is at _spin_lock+0xa/0x15
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: EAX: c079349c EBX: f79ec580 ECX:
>> ffffffff EDX: 00008381
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: ESI: ffffffff EDI: f79ec580 EBP:
>> f68a6580 ESP: f1824e50
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS:
>> 0068
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: CR0: 8005003b CR2: b7ebf978 CR3:
>> 32996000 CR4: 000006f0
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2:
>> 00000000 DR3: 00000000
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04119c7>] ?
>> native_flush_tlb_others+0x49/0x9b
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c0411e65>] ? flush_tlb_mm+0x51/0x54
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c045bc58>] ? exit_mmap+0x93/0xc9
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04214c2>] ? mmput+0x25/0x68
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046e9c9>] ?
>> flush_old_exec+0x4f8/0x777
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046dfcf>] ? kernel_read+0x32/0x43
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c0490e60>] ?
>> load_elf_binary+0x359/0x1152
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c045a6ee>] ?
>> get_user_pages+0x2d5/0x35c
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04570d2>] ? page_address+0x78/0x98
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c045735a>] ? kmap_high+0x19/0x16b
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04570d2>] ? page_address+0x78/0x98
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046dced>] ? copy_strings+0x169/0x173
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046ddad>] ?
>> search_binary_handler+0x8f/0x1af
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c046efe7>] ? do_execve+0x133/0x194
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04030d7>] ? sys_execve+0x2a/0x4a
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c04047aa>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: [<c0610000>] ? early_init_intel+0x0/0x3c
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: =======================
>> Jul 25 02:15:02 vega2008 kernel: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for
>> 61s! [http_cap:12228]
>> .............
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> I choose CentOS because I believe it is the most stable OS in
>> commodity machines.
>> But I don't know how to do when facing the trouble.
>>
>> The difference lies in that I patched a PF_RING patch in original
>> kernel and recompiled
>> the kernel to run my machines. I wonder whether the patched kernel
>> crashes the CentOS
>> because PF_RING automatically downloads the kernel codes from
>> www.kernel.org, but not
>> the one from www.centos.org? Or, the centOS holds the bugs in its
>> distribution?
>>
>
> This is very common, a google search for:
>
> 'poweredge 1950' 'BUG: soft lockup' 'stuck'
>
> produces almost 2000 results. It seems to be something to do with the on
> board network ports.
>
> I do not seen this problem ... has anyone else?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
