Re: Bind Firewall Rules

["Lanny Marcus" <lmmailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:27 PM, John Hinton <webmaster@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK, so does anybody have a good firewall rule solution for what we're
> supposed to be doing with bind these days? Obviously port 53 is no longer
> enough.

Consider  using djbdns instead of BIND. It sounds like an excellent alternative
to BIND.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Djbdns>
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos