Re: Yum strangeness

["William L. Maltby" <CentOS4Bill@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 10:55 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Lorenzo Quatrini wrote:
> > <snip>

> > Which is the "safest" setup for priorities?
> > 
> > base, update and extras: priority=1
> > ATrpms (which should not replace _any_ base package): priority=10
> > rpmforge (which could have some base package updated): priority=20
> > EPEL: priority=30
> > 
> > and so on with other repos...
> > 
> > Does this look reasonable?
> 
> that looks OK ... the other affect of this is that ATrpms have 
> precedence over rpmforge, which has precedence over EPEL, etc.
> 
> So, if that is the precedence you want then that is the way to go.

And don't forget to either disable or remove "protect" if you have them
installed/enabled. Look at them as mutually exclusive.

> <snip sig stuff>

-- 
Bill

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos