Re: centralized patch management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





----- Message from rainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---------
    Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:08:06 +0200
    From: Rainer Duffner <rainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
 Subject: Re:  centralized patch management
      To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>


Terry schrieb:
Hello,

I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch
management of our linux servers.  Today, this is only centos and rhel.
  What is everyone else doing in this arena?




I investigated this earlier.
The only thing that seems halfway usable is pakiti:
http://pakiti.sourceforge.net/

People who think that running "yum update" every night is a solution
should go back and do some research.
This is how it might work at home (mostly), but not the way you deploy
patches to a large number of systems who serve different purposes and
thus have different package-selections, user-requirements,
patch-policies and downtime-schemas etc.pp.

I hope to be able to test pakiti soon.



cheers,
Rainer
_______________________________________________

Ok, so what would you suggest is a good practice for a hosting environment with a few different RH based (CentOS & Fedora Core) servers, all doing different stuff?


--

Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux