On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:42:12AM -0700, Chris Miller wrote: > > I just had a customer's bind server lose all of it's local DNS records. > Yum updated the bind packages this morning at ~6am, and replaced the > original /etc/named.conf file, saving the old as named.conf.rpmsave. This > seems like the opposite of what it should have done (i.e. save the new > file as named.conf.rpmnew). If you have the caching-nameserver package, it's the expected behaviour: /etc/named.conf is "owned" and labelled as "config file" for caching-nameserver. The regular bind/bind-chroot don't provide named.conf. You should not install the caching-nameserver package if you are indeed providing DNS services with bind... Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B
Attachment:
pgpARGBDTn2pi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
