>If this is true, why did this package get updated? Can't answer that, but do you use yum-priorities? I was actually just looking at ATRPMS and about to see if it had what I needed for a new install. It would be good to know if that problem happened with the repo protection in place... jlc _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "'CentOS mailing list'" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
- From: "Joseph L. Casale" <JCasale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:28:02 -0600
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <4872725C.1050305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <4872725C.1050305@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Thread-index: AcjgahFR/f0l7NrOSq6YVEsoARqWcgADfMCA
- Thread-topic: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
- From: Scott Silva
- Re: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
- References:
- pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
- From: Kenneth Burgener
- pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
- Prev by Date: Re: yum-updatesd not working on CentOS 5.2
- Next by Date: Re: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch [FIXED]
- Next by thread: Re: pm-utils - ATrpms updates a system package on the stable branch
- Index(es):
 |