On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:45:25PM -0700, MHR wrote: > [mrichter@sushi lane]$ rsh khan ls > poll: protocol failure in circuit setup Are you sure there are no firewalls in place that could be blocking access? Note that "rsh machine" really calls "rlogin machine" and so talks on a different port (port 513) whereas "rsh machine command" uses port 514. You should tcpdump the traffic while trying to do an rsh to see what is going on. -- rgds Stephen _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: rsh problems in CentOS 5.2 (was "cvs command failure on 5.2")
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CentOS mailing list <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: rsh problems in CentOS 5.2 (was "cvs command failure on 5.2")
- From: Stephen Harris <lists@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 16:59:36 -0400
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <f4e013870807071345g195231f2o8b0b897cd314401b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <f4e013870807071153o35e2ec7cm3cf4bbc9d85617f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080707191359.GA7287@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f4e013870807071345g195231f2o8b0b897cd314401b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rsh problems in CentOS 5.2 (was "cvs command failure on 5.2")
- From: MHR
- Re: rsh problems in CentOS 5.2 (was "cvs command failure on 5.2")
- From: William L. Maltby
- Re: rsh problems in CentOS 5.2 (was "cvs command failure on 5.2")
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: UTF-8 support in PCRE
- Next by Date: Re: Couple of CentOS 5.2 dhcp notes
- Previous by thread: Re: rsh problems in CentOS 5.2 (was "cvs command failure on 5.2")
- Next by thread: Re: rsh problems in CentOS 5.2 (was "cvs command failure on 5.2")
- Index(es):
 |