On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That will probably build as is on CentOS-3 > Our aim is to bring it up to 5.2 (the latest) if possible. Thanks. mhr _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: mkdep vs. makedepend
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: mkdep vs. makedepend
- From: MHR <mhullrich@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 15:32:07 -0700
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <486E9F68.4040505@xxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <f4e013870807041450x272c479v724ef986461a6bb5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <486E9F68.4040505@xxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- mkdep vs. makedepend
- From: MHR
- Re: mkdep vs. makedepend
- From: Johnny Hughes
- mkdep vs. makedepend
- Prev by Date: Re: mkdep vs. makedepend
- Next by Date: Re: Three Identical systems - short cut to setting up the drives?
- Previous by thread: Re: mkdep vs. makedepend
- Next by thread: Re: mkdep vs. makedepend
- Index(es):
 |