Robert Moskowitz wrote on Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:54:11 -0400: > Is this formatted better? Were you referring to my remark about unreadability? I replied to John. Your's are always good to read, although you could trim a bit ;-) Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: INIT 5 and system is gone
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: INIT 5 and system is gone
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:31:08 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <486BA4A3.4050709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <016301c8dc4f$14256020$0700a8c0@ethan27> <486BA4A3.4050709@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References:
- RE: INIT 5 and system is gone
- From: John
- Re: INIT 5 and system is gone
- From: Robert Moskowitz
- RE: INIT 5 and system is gone
- Prev by Date: Last and final official release candidate of the com.oonics open shared root cluster installation DVD is available (RC4)
- Next by Date: Re: Acer 5920 audio chip does not work in CentOS 5.2?
- Previous by thread: Re: INIT 5 and system is gone
- Next by thread: Re: INIT 5 and system is gone
- Index(es):
 |