"John R Pierce" <pierce@xxxxxxxxxxxx> schreef in bericht news:4869D3AE.3060109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > John wrote: >> What did I do offend you or others? >> > > sending 400K bytes of unsolicited attachments to 1000s of mailboxes is not > exactly polite. My intention was to provide log's to clarify my observed problem, I did not realize the impact of you comment. My apologies to all members of the mailinglist. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Re: Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- From: "John" <jknappers-argentia@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 10:48:10 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- References: <g4a8jd$5go$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><g4a985$7kj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.OSX.1.10.0806301535080.3776@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><g4cjub$8kv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4869D3AE.3060109@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- From: Kai Schaetzl
- Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- References:
- Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- From: John
- Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- From: John
- Re: Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- From: Paul Heinlein
- Re: Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- From: John
- Re: Re: Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- From: John R Pierce
- Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- Prev by Date: RE: Spacewalk from Redhat
- Next by Date: Re: Acer 5920 audio chip does not work in CentOS 5.2?
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- Next by thread: Re: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
- Index(es):
 |