On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:08:03PM -0700, nate wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > I did an update yesterday evening, and didn't spot that it had changed
> > permissions on my .procmailrc. Consequently no mail came in after that.
> > I've been out most of today, so just got it fixed, but what will have
> > happened to the mail for the missing period? Maillog just shows that
> > messages have been passed to procmail. Procmail won't run if the perms are
> > wrong, so where do the messages go?
>
> $HOME/dead.letter ?
A _sane_ delivery agent would definately return a temporary error (4xx)
either to it's own internal queue, or return the error to the connecting MTA.
The mail would in that case survive for a queueing period which is
usually 5 to 7 days.
But, when it comes to procmail, it might depend on your invocation:
PROCMAIL(1)
On general failure procmail will return EX_CANTCREAT, unless
option -t is specified, in which case it will return EX_TEMPFAIL.
Are you using sendmail or some other mda?
Investigating sendmail source you'll find:
./sendmail/sysexits.h:
* EX_CANTCREAT -- A (user specified) output file cannot be
* created.
* EX_TEMPFAIL -- temporary failure, indicating something that
* is not really an error. In sendmail, this means
* that a mailer (e.g.) could not create a connection,
* and the request should be reattempted later.
./sendmail/deliver.c:
case EX_NOINPUT:
case EX_CANTCREAT:
case EX_NOPERM:
status = "5.3.0";
break;
Unfortunately, for you, if -t was left out, it would mean a 5xx error code
- permanent error - and a /dev/null of your email.
--
Mikael
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
