RE: settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



>-----Original Message-----
>From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of
>Rainer Duffner
>Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 12:27 AM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re:  settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?
>
>>>> Actually, the calculation is that it needs a GB of RAM for every
>>>> TB of
>> managed data.
>>
>> How do you reckon this? Ie, what's the basic assumption(s) for the
>> statement?
>> Parity calculations for stripes or what? I don't follow.
>>
>> I can't say I've ever heard any such like, so please do enlighten me!
>>
>
>
>It used to be written in the solarisinternals.com wiki - but I can't
>seem to find it anymore.
>
>ZFS is a moving target, in some ways, so the requirements may have
>changed or are no longer that simple.
>
>But it made sense in the early days, when SUN's thumper (X4500, 2*DC
>Opteron, 48 disks, 16 GB RAM) more or less fit the requirements
>perfectly.

Gotcha', thx!

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux