Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 09:24 +0200, centos@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Removing perl.i386 fixed this... Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ralph Angenendt" <ra+centos@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:34:11 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna Subject: Re: Upgrade perl; package conflict Phil Schaffner wrote:On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 08:55 +0200, centos@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:I'm working on upgrading my Xen Domain0 to CentOs 5.2. However, yum update gives me a package conflict on perl:...Using a x86_64 install btw.Anyone seen this one??Please don't hijack threads with a "Reply" when starting a new topic. This problem is due to the lack of an i386 RPM in x86_64 repos. See http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2918perl.i386 is *now* in the extras repository (as stated by the Release Notes) which is enabled by default. As it is not in upstream's x86_64 tree, it's not going into the CentOS os/ or updates/ tree either. That's why I closed that bug again. RalphRalph, I am still having this same problem. The only non-CentOS package I have installed is Astro::Time via cpan. I have looked at the bug report but am not sure what to do next. I have two x86_64 units that still have the problem. Any ideas? Greg
Do you not have extras enabled on this machine?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
