On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 18:42 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
> Hmmm,
>
> I seemed to have created a misalignment somewhere along the line. I
> can't remember doing anything to this.<snip>
> # yum update
> <omit the usual verbosity>
>
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package java-1.4.2-gcj-compat.i386 0:1.4.2.0-40jpp.115 set to be
> updated
> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers for
> package: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers for
> package: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers for
> package: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
> --> Processing Dependency: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers for
> package: java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers is needed
> by package java-1.4.2-gcj-compat
> ========================================
>
> ========================================
> # yum whatprovides /usr/bin/rebuild-security-providers
> <omit the usual verbosity>
> jpackage-utils.noarch : JPackage utilities
> =========================================
>
Well, I went through the on line manifest (a misnomer apparently as it
lists added, updated and removed, but not unchanged packages). The only
reference I found to jpackage was in the gcj-compat package.
I tried a remove of it and aborted when I saw it would get rid of a
bunch of stuff I need, like OpenOffice.
So I can't confirm if I have the right one or not that way.
> =========================================
> # yum list jpackage-utils.noarch
> <omit the usual verbosity>
> Installed Packages
> jpackage-utils.noarch 1.7.4-2jpp.2.el5.cento installed
> Available Packages
> jpackage-utils.noarch 1.7.3-1jpp.2.el5 base
> ===========================================
>
> I presume that the 1.7.4 is the correct one? If so,
>
> ================================================
> # rpm --verbose --verify jpackage-utils.noarch
> ........<snip output - all looked OK to me>
--
Bill
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
