William L. Maltby wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:48:48 -0400: > 2. yum upgrade # not update that's supposed to be the same. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: is centos update safe
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: is centos update safe
- From: Kai Schaetzl <maillists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:31:34 +0200
- Delivered-to: centos@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1214506128.7162.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <3489.91.198.134.226.1214505966.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4863E18F.5030603@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1214506128.7162.3.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: is centos update safe
- From: William L. Maltby
- Re: is centos update safe
- References:
- is centos update safe
- From: fabian dacunha
- Re: is centos update safe
- From: John R Pierce
- Re: is centos update safe
- From: William L. Maltby
- is centos update safe
- Prev by Date: Re: Centos 5.2 Install - lvcreate failed for ...
- Next by Date: Re: is centos update safe
- Previous by thread: Re: is centos update safe
- Next by thread: Re: is centos update safe
- Index(es):
 |