Re: recommendations for copying large filesystems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Dag Wieers <dag@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have done 700k and 800k files transfers (including hardlinks), but indeed it could take a while to compute the transferlist. Newer rsync versions bring down the amount of memory needed drastically. That is one of the reasons I offer a recent rsync in RPMforge. There is almost never a good reason to use a dated rsync.

I just thought I'd de-lurk and chime in that there are some patches for ssh to allow better performance:

http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/

If you do end up using rsync for something like this via ssh, you might want to look at some of the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center's patches.  The high-performance patches can allow you to see dramatic increases in throughput.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux