Re: Re: Re: Not seeing all memory in CentOS 5.1 x86_64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:31 PM, henry ritzlmayr <centos@xxxxxx> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.06.2008, 10:06 -0700 schrieb MHR:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:36 AM, Ruslan Sivak <russ@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I guess it has something to do with the ballooning driver for Dom0.  It
> > looks like I just tried to allocation too much memory to DomU and the box
> > went down hard.  I think there's a setting in xen to the min amount of
> > memory to go down to, but I'm not sure why Dom0 is using 600mb of RAM.  Is
> > there a mini installation of CentOS that I can do that would use less RAM?
> >  I've already unchecked all the boxes when installing CentOS. I would like
> > Dom0 to be as small as possible, both due to RAM usage and from a security
> > perspective.
>
> I've not familiarized myself with xen yet, but have you considered
> VMware Server?  I haven't had any serious problems with it, and none
> at all since v1.0.5 came out (1.0.6 is the current one).  Works
> nicely, stays within its memory allocation, and top et al work as
> you'd expect them to.
>
> HTH
>
> mhr

I evaluated VMware Server myself (v1.0.3) and at that time, Disk I/O was
pretty bad within a virtual machine. The only solution I found was XEN
with paravirtualization. Has there been any progress on that with later
releases?

For example:

dd if=/dev/md5 of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1000 on bare metal gave 272 MB/s
same within VMware gave only 47,9 MB/s

I know that dd is not a benchmark - but for measuring sequential reads
within a system its fair enough for me.

Henry


_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Does anyone has tested Openvz?
I see many hosting providers using Openvz with CentOS, but haven't had the time to tried out yet, I know it's not paravirtualization but maybe someone has been able to use it sucessfully?
I have the same issue with RHEL 5.2, just showing 4Gigs of my 6Gigs box.

Cheers,
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux