On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 11:35 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
community based OSS also require a level of professionalism and support. if simple questions like asking for an update to the progress of a project or stating someone may be in error upsets one of the members of that project, maybe that person should not be involved.James Bunnell wrote: > i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to > centos. damage is done. on the next major upgrade, i will > return to rhel and will not professionally recommend centos > either privately,personally, or in the realm of a business. > thanks for seeing my side of the issue and not jumping on the > elite bandwagon. i am done. Community base OSS solutions are not for everyone. Only the end-user can decide if it works for them or not. I hope you will see that once the anger subsides. -Ross
______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. _______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
