James Bunnell wrote: > I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed > CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS > 5 was one kernel behind, as in RHEL it is at -53, the gentlemen then > told me that I was wrong and it was at -21. lftp ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS> ls kernel* > kernel.list lftp ftp.redhat.com:/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/5Server/en/os/SRPMS> exit [angenenr@shutdown ~]$grep 53 kernel.list -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54464006 Feb 12 14:37 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.13.el5.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54492476 Mar 03 09:40 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54521781 May 04 07:52 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.19.el5.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54540423 May 19 09:58 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.21.el5.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54421174 Nov 28 2007 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 2 ftp ftp 54461630 Jan 18 11:29 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.6.el5.src.rpm -rw-rw-r-- 1 ftp ftp 54386174 Oct 11 2007 kernel-2.6.18-53.el5.src.rpm [angenenr@shutdown ~]$ So which kernel would that -53 be? The one from October 11th, 2007? > I then asked if there was a way to get a progress report somehow on > 5.2, and that 5.2 has already upgraded that kernel. The result was > that I was banned for being correct. a) #centos-social is not a support channel, as that channel's topic clearly states. b) The ban was *not* for you being correct (because you are not, 5.2 will have 2.6.18-92, but for your behaviour over the last days/weeks and your *constantly* asking about progress on 5.2 (and getting the answer everybody getsdoes, see http://planet.centos.org/). > I dont understand this kind of support. I don't understand why you came here to whine about that. Ralph
Attachment:
pgpz6THS07Hkj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
