Bent Terp wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Johnny Hughes
> <johnny@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me.
>
> Interesting, I thought that XFS was fairly safe for use. What would
> you recommend for filesystems in the 50-500 terabyte range?
>
> (And yes, we do actually run a 70 TB at the moment, so I'm not asking
> just to annoy you; I'm genuinely interested in your opinion as well as
> those of others, so feel free to chip in)
Assuming you still want those all-in-one file systems then you
may want to look at JFS as I have heard good things about both
it's stability and performance.
Is there anyone running JFS currently that can attest to that?
-Ross
______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
