Re: RAID5 or RAID50 for database?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Linux wrote:

And stick with md-raid 10 (also known as software raid) because it is
much more intelligently designed than any
closed-source-embedded-raid-controller.

"More intelligently designed" -> Could you please tell us more on this one?


i
Nowadays hardware raid frightens me because of the need to have spare
raid-controllers for every hardware-raid-configuration I have. They
are neither interchangable nor easily recoverable.

md-raid 10 can be established with any number of disks (at least 3 but
better check with google)


Not easily recoverable? I did recovery many time without a hitch (Adaptec, 3Ware, LSI, PERC)!

As for RAID 10 with 3 disks, mmm... go see:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redundant_array_of_independent_disks


Lastly, it's kinda strange that your name is "Linux": Maybe you're young and your parents decided to honor this great OS! Well, i may name my next children "Cento" !!! ;-)


Hey, have a nice day "Linuxito" !


Guy Boisvert, ing.
IngTegration inc.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux