John R Pierce wrote:
Guy Boisvert wrote:
It seems that after all those years of Outlook problems, some are just
into "extreme sports"...
actually, Outlook Express, and its follow-on Windows Mail, have been FAR
more standards compliant than Outlook itself ever was or will be.
Outlook Express was originally MS Internet Mail and News, aka MSIMN,
which in fact was still the name of the executable last I looked.
I've been using Mozilla Thunderbird this past couple years, and I've got
a few complaints about it, too (mainly, switching from plaintext to html
formatted or visa versa is an ugly process and doesn't handle the
conversion at all well at edit time)
You have all my admiration to be "extreme enough" to deal with M$ stuff!
I lost patience with them long time ago and i **HATE** the way they
are always play dirty with standards.
The current Outlook Express could be the best in the world, i wouldn't
use it! I know, i shouldn't say that... It's just that i can't stand M$
way of doing things and i don't see them change in the next century!
Well, sorry John for my rant, it came deep from my heart!
And yes, Thunderbird is not perfect as 100% of the software on the planet!
Guy Boisvert, ing.
IngTegration inc.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
