-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Les Mikesell wrote:
| Milton Calnek wrote:
|>
|>
|> MHR wrote:
|> | On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Anne Wilson
|> <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|> |> Labeling in gmail doesn't help if you are forwarding to an
|> Outlook account,
|> |> though.
|>
|> | Also, it would be nice if all lists used good subject labeling
the way
|> | the CentOS and yum lists do (and not, e.g., the rpmforge list,
which
|> | uses "users" exactly the same way that OOo does, making them
|> | impossible to distinguish from the subject alone, or the gnome list
|> | which has no tags at all).
|> |
|> That's what procmail is for...
|>
|> #
|> # Mail Scanner
|> #
|> :0 hfw
|> * ^Return-Path: <mailscanner-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
|> |sed -e 's/^Subject:/Subject: \[MailScanner\]/'
|>
|
| What will that look like after someone uses it replies a few times on
| the same thread?
Good point. I guess other subscribers don't do it that way, else I'd
have noticed it.
Maybe
sed -re 's/^Subject: (^\[MailScanner\])/Subject: \[MailScanner\]/'
The ^ and the ( may need to be reversed... I'm not sure.
|
- --
Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.)
milton@xxxxxxxxxx
306-717-8737
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFILIvRHgnbf2T2QqMRAqRMAKC+D2ntHMew/JoPQ1sIjJp4h6yipACfZmX3
ViSAmnUQn/1ba8znJeTvBFg=
=o/4P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
