Tru,
I work at a university. They don't provide enough money for test
environments :). Just kinda odd, last time kernel update, gfs updated
at the same time so all was well. But twice now kernel has upgraded
with no GFS so it went bye-bye. Is the GFS being installed, compiled
against particular kernel headers, or could I just copy the /fs/gfs
and /fs/gfs_locking to the new kernel /lib/modules (or symlink for that
matter) and be lucky enough it would work?
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 22:48 +0200, Tru Huynh wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:00:18PM +0300, Linux wrote:
> > Well, I should add a terrible story for XFS...
> >
> > I did a "yum update" and after updating many packages I rebooted and viola...
> You seem to enjoy living dangerously ? Don't you ever use a testing machine
> before rolling the updates on a production server?
> We appreciate your trust in our project, but you should always test on your
> own setup.
>
> > Old xfs module ruined my 1.2TB partition. After updating to correct module and
> > hours of xfs_repair I had to move and rename 500 subfolders from lost+found.
> That is the 1st time I hear such a story: if the xfs module is not installed
> for your new kernel, the only thing that should happen is the inability to
> mount the XFS filesystem.
> >
> > I am using CentOS because I have to (for cPanel).
> That's trolling, CPanel is NOT CentOS...
>
> Tru
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
