Re: ext3 filesystems larger than 8TB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:36:41PM -0500, Monty Shinn wrote:
Greetings.

I am trying to create a 10TB (approx) ext3 filesystem. I am able to successfully create the partition using parted, but when I try to use mkfs.ext3, I get an error stating there is an 8TB limit for ext3 filesystems.

I looked at the specs for 5 on the "upstream" vendor's website, and they indicate that there is a 16TB limit on ext3.

Has anyone been able to create a ext3 filesystem larger than 8TB?

If ext3 isn't an option, has anyone used the kmod-xfs-smp.i686 module mentioned on the centos site? Surely it doesn't have an 8TB limit...

specs:

Centos 5.1
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
3Ware 9550SXU 12port raid card

Am I just walking into a big nightmare?

Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

I think it *theoretically* should work as ext3 should to 16TB.
However, we ran into issues with userland tools and such.  Possibly
related to x86_64 vs i386 stuff, but in the end to avoid continued
troubleshooting we just used centosplus + jfs. Works perfectly for our
10TB filesystem.

I'm curious what you store that you need 10TB of linear storage?

I have had 4-6-8TB storage systems, but the storage was always
divvied up between different applications.

-Ross

______________________________________________________________________
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Ross,

We basically store video image sequences (edited and source) and audio/video files on our servers. We are an editing and broadcast design facility, doing mostly HD work. The files are relatively large, and there are a lot of them.

I am trying to "max out" our current server population, moving from 250 and 500 gig drives to the Seagate 1TB enterprise (ES.2) SATA drives using the 12 port 3ware raid card.

I have at least 4 servers that I am wanting to upgrade this way.

They're just file servers running NFS and Samba.

Do I *need* a 10TB partition? No, not really. I could segment into 2 5TB partitions if needed, and I may still end up doing that. I am beginning to wonder if the >8TB ext3 limit has been vetted enough. It is just easier for the users if it was one partition.

I have to say when the mkfs.ext3 code hasn't been changed to allow >8TB partitions without adding the -F, (which did seem to work) it gives me pause.

Naively perhaps, I didn't think it would be an issue.

Thanks,

Monty
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux