on 4-18-2008 1:38 AM Fajar Priyanto spake the following:
The big difference is that the LTSP package was set up to overcome the limitations of the pure upstream version.Hello all,I have a customer that insists of using upstream vendor's diskless (system-config-netboot) rather than LTSP. The reason is that he wants to use a 100% packages from the vendor, not from LTSP or any other party.I try the vendor's diskless system, and although it's very simple to setup, it lacks the support and/or documentation whereas LTSP is very good in it. Another sample is that he wants to connect a scanner to the client, I doubt it can be, since there's no documentation about it at all from the vendor.Is there any fundamental difference between the two setups? Thank you.
Have a look at K12ltsp.org. They have a version based on Centos-5. Maybe it will fill your need.
-- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos