On Sun, 2008-04-13 at 15:04 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > IIRC, you don't have a real snapshot on the LV ATM. The snapshot LV only
> > contains files that were chang(ed/ing) while the snapshot volume was
> > "attached" during the backup.
>
> That does not mean you cant use the snapshot, as long as you are ready
> to live with the fallouts of such a move ( and have enough space
> allocated )
Right. I started to say something about that earlier (I have an
automated b/u script I wrote way-back-when that takes advantage of the
snapshot facility) but decided that mentioning that to the OP might lead
to some unexpected hardships for him/her. I decided that just letting
h{im | er } know that it didn't have the full FS was a better choice of
information to pass on.
And in all honesty, it's been so long since I read up on it (vers 1,
IIRC) and looked at the script, I really didn't feel qualified to
suggest anything useful with any certainty.
--
Bill
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
