Re: Interface bonding?

[John <jses27@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 19:45 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Timothy Selivanow wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 17:23 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > 
> >> This should give you what you need when doing 802.3ad LAGs:
> >>
> >> interface FastEthernet0/21
> >>  port group 1
> >>  spanning-tree portfast
> >> !
> >> interface FastEthernet0/22
> >>  port group 1
> >>  spanning-tree portfast
> >> !
> > 
> > Using this on the switch and mode=4 for bonding results in the machine
> > not being able to contact anything (happens with just 'port group 1'
> > too, I tried that a "long" time ago), but there aren't any errors.  So,
> > it doesn't work, but I couldn't tell you why.  Is there anything else
> > that needs to be done, perhaps on the host's side?
> 
> Does the same thing happen if you only connect one interface?  I was 
> under the impression that a single member of a group would work the same 
> way as a normal interface.    Also does it help to add 'distribution 
> destination'?

Have you tried Port Group 2 - 8. Hardware Failing? Those are the right
commands for it as I found in the cisco docs.


> 
-- 
~/john

OpenPGP Sig:BA91F079

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos