Re: Interface bonding?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



John wrote:
Now for what version of the 2900 you have I do not know. But it seems
the info on Ciscos site is kind of misleading in places. There is some
documentation that says it works and some say you have to have the add
on modules.
Your best bet if your not comfortable with the IOS command line is to
use the Web Interface or the Cisco Works Manager Interface. I say this
because I have really no way of knowing your experiance on this.  I
wouln't do this on a live production switch.

Trunking has to do with carrying multiple tagged vlans on one port - and the 2900xl with a 12.x IOS should do that in either ISL (cisco) or dot1q mode. But I thought we were grouping ports instead. You should be able to do both, but the interfaces in the same port group would have to have the same trunk encapsulation set. There is a separate 'vlan database' command on those switches where you have to add the vlan numbers that you want a trunk to carry - and it doesn't get saved in the visible config file. If you have 'switchport access vlan nnn' on any interface that number goes in the vlan database automatically but you just want the trunk ports to pass some other vlans through you have to add them explicitly.

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux