Re: Interface bonding?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 11:49 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 14:26 -0400, John wrote:
> > If I paid a couple grand for a core switch i'd be calling Cisco!
> > 
> 
> They're not core switches, they're just the catalyst 2900XL which is a
> small 24 port switch.  We've got stacks of these sitting unused, so I
> doubt they're too expensive/valuable.

>From what I was taught all Catalyst Switched and Routers are of "Core
Type" Some just not the fancy functionality you desire.

If you look at my previous post I listed what was supported by the 2900
switch. Then I give you a command to ""try"". And I didn't say the
command would work either. If it worked you would have knew off the bat
that the switch supported it.

 
> 
> 
> --Tim
>  ________________________________________________________ 
> < God isn't dead, he just couldn't find a parking place. >
>  -------------------------------------------------------- 
>   \
>    \   \
>         \ /\
>         ( )
>       .( o ).
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-- 
~/john

OpenPGP Sig:BA91F079

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [CentOS Announce]     [CentOS Development]     [CentOS ARM Devel]     [CentOS Docs]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Carrier Grade Linux]     [Linux Media]     [Asterisk]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Xorg]     [Linux USB]
  Powered by Linux