Jim Perrin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 4:35 PM, David Hrbác( <hrbac.conf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jim, you are not right... SSL 3.0 support Server Name Indication and of
course TLS 1.0. For those who are interested there are repos for C{4,5}
located here:
Since I should have included this in my previous reply... I don't mind
being wrong, so long as it's documented.
Can you show the config for CentOS 4, (without the TLS packages you
list) to do name based vhosts with ssl? I'd be interested in this
myself. Given that the apache documentation for 2.0.x says it can't be
done, I was basing my statements off that.
Do browsers do TLS these days? I thought https had to negotiate the ssl
connection before the browser would send anything - so you don't have
the host header when you need to find the right certificate. It doesn't
matter if the ssl layer knows how to do TLS if the browser side won't
use it.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
