On 07/04/2008, at 10:10 PM, Simon Jolle wrote:
2008/4/7, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
What is the closest open source mail server I can replace exchange
with
that provides the nearest equivalent in user experience?
What about Zimbra or Scallix?
Both not Open Source
Scalix uses Scalix Public License (SPL) and Zimbra uses Yahoo Public
License (YPL) - both crap licenses and not OSI approved.
cheers
Simon
Open Source does not depend on the license. You've been drinking the
GPL koolaid too long if you think this is the case.
Without turning this into a religious debate that I can see on the
horizon, you should really read this:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php
Comparing the Zimbra licensing (http://www.zimbra.com/license/) to the
definitions in the link above, Zimbra seems to fit the definition of
Open Source...
The Scalix license (http://www.scalix.com/community/opensource/licensing.php
) may also fit the bill...
--
Steven Haigh
Email: netwiz@xxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.crc.id.au
Phone: (03) 9001 6090 - 0412 935 897
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
