On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:32 +1100, Gavin Carr wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:08:50AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 14:48 +1100, Gavin Carr wrote: > > > Can anyone explain this to me? (CentOS 4/5) > > > > > > # rpm -qf /etc/exports > > > setup > > > # rpm -V setup > > > S.5....T c /etc/bashrc > > > S.5....T c /etc/printcap > > > ..?..... c /etc/securetty > > > # echo '#### foo' > /etc/exports > > > # cat /etc/exports > > > #### foo > > > # rpm -V setup > > > S.5....T c /etc/bashrc > > > S.5....T c /etc/printcap > > > ..?..... c /etc/securetty > > > > > > I thought verify was supposed to check every file in the package? > > > > From the spec file: > > > > %verify(not md5 size mtime) %config(noreplace) /etc/exports > > > > rpm has been explicitly told to *not* check certain traits. > > Ah, very cool, thanks. Any pointers to why one would do this? Verifying against a stock /etc/bashrc is useful, since it influences system behavior. Verifying against a stock /etc/exports is not, beyond who owns the file and what permissions it has. -- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@xxxxxxxxx> PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ CentOS mailing list CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
