It runs fine under root and with sudo.
S
On Mar 7, 2008, at 15:33 , Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Does it run as 'root'?
-Ross
-----Original Message-----
From: centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:centos-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of S Roderick
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 3:28 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: Unable open raw socket in CentOS 5 - SE
Linux and kernelcapability interaction?
Does anyone have any idea on this one? Based on everything
we've tried
with kernel capabilities and SE Linux parameters, we're missing
something. Have tried everything we can find online.
Thanks
Stephen
On Mar 3, 2008, at 09:14 , S Roderick wrote:
I am wondering what is the interaction between SE Linux and the
kernel "capabilities" in CentOS 5.1? I'm trying to open a
raw socket
and keep getting permission denied errors. I've tried using
the lcap
library to find that CAP_SETPCAP appears to be off in the kernel.
For compliance reasons, I don't want to turn this on. I've also
tried a hand-crafted SE Linux module policy. I have verified that
the test program runs in the correct SE Linux domain and it
generates no audit errors, but it still fails to open the
port with
permission denied.
It appears that SE Linux is not preventing the socket being
created
(as evidenced by the lack of audit messages), so what am I
missing?
Do I still need to modify capabilities within the program, even if
I'm using an SE Linux policy?
Thanks
S
Source file
#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/prctl.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
int
main(void)
{
int fd = socket(PF_INET, SOCK_RAW, IPPROTO_TCP);
if (-1 == fd)
{
printf("Failed to open raw socket: %d=%s\n", errno,
strerror(errno));
}
else
{
printf("Socket opened successfully\n");
close(fd);
}
return 0;
}
SElinux .te file
policy_module(rawsox,1.0.0)
########################################
# Declarations
type rawsox_t;
type rawsox_exec_t;
domain_type(rawsox_t)
domain_entry_file(rawsox_t, rawsox_exec_t)
domain_auto_trans(unconfined_t,rawsox_exec_t,rawsox_t)
########################################
# Rawsox local policy
# these two didn't help
#corenet_raw_sendrecv_all_if( rawsox_t );
#corenet_raw_sendrecv_all_nodes( rawsox_t );
require {
type lib_t;
type ld_so_t;
type ld_so_cache_t;
type usr_t;
type devpts_t;
type rawsox_t;
type etc_t;
class lnk_file read;
class dir search;
class file { read getattr execute };
class chr_file { read write getattr };
class rawip_socket create;
class capability net_raw;
}
#============= rawsox_t ==============
allow rawsox_t devpts_t:chr_file { read write getattr };
allow rawsox_t etc_t:dir search;
allow rawsox_t ld_so_cache_t:file { read getattr };
allow rawsox_t ld_so_t:file read;
allow rawsox_t lib_t:dir search;
allow rawsox_t lib_t:file { read getattr execute };
allow rawsox_t lib_t:lnk_file read;
allow rawsox_t usr_t:dir search;
allow rawsox_t self:capability { net_raw setuid };
allow rawsox_t self:rawip_socket { create ioctl read write bind
getopt setopt };
allow rawsox_t self:unix_stream_socket { create_socket_perms };
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
