-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 02/22/2008 04:46 PM, nate wrote:
> carlopmart wrote:
>
> I'd suggest sticking to 32-bit. Thunderbird is already a memory pig,
> using 64-bit version would only make it worse.
Why?
> My Thunderbird has been running for about 18 hours and is using
> over 200MB of memory already(2.0.0.6).
The same here. Thunderbird is running for 3 hours and use 216 MB virtual
memory size/ 90 MB resident set size.
I am subscribing to Debian, Centos, SecurityFocus and RHEL mailing
lists. Nothing special.
> In 64-bit mode I wouldn't be surprised if the same usage would
> come out to 500MB+ memory usage.
Again why?
> Of course if you have enough memory not to care to set aside half
> a gig to your e-mail client then go for it.
>
> nate
cheers
Simon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHxdeFEMN/lNE/wrwRAsPNAKCGak82jNYu7T+4/cv5asS9UWaj0QCfTVGV
HDbm07TPub5ev64DjNRQnsk=
=JqB+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@xxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
